Altitude Land Use and Rezone Proposal

Expressed concern that the high-density project conflicts with the city's 2020 general plan emphasizing agricultural preservation and large lots, and questioned fencing safety for farm animals.

Shared concerns about turning a quiet agricultural pasture into a crowded urban development that harms wildlife and rural lifestyle.

Questioned what studies have been done regarding the impact of 222 new units on overcrowded local schools and packed school buses.

Raised questions about future bridge costs, police presence along the river trail, traffic signals, and potential sewer line impacts.

Argued that high-density housing ruins the scenic gateway entrance to the city and negatively impacts local wildlife.

Asked for visual renderings showing how 4-story buildings will fit in and expressed concern over wildlife preservation.

Stated that frequently rezoning property originally protected in 2020 undermines public trust in the general plan.

Questioned the utility of having a general plan if it can be easily bypassed whenever a developer brings a high-density project forward.

Expressed deep disappointment over losing mountain views, safety concerns near the river, and potential drops in neighboring property values.